California faces growing costs of aging women’s prison population

AHPA

Sophia Meador

As public health professionals from across the nation gather at APHA 2026 under the theme “Together We Thrive: Health Across the Lifespan,” conversations focus on solutions to the challenges of an aging population. One session turned attention to a group often overlooked in those discussions: older women behind bars. 

At two of California’s women’s prisons — Central California Women’s Facility and California Institution for Women — 740 incarcerated women were ages 50 and older in 2025, representing roughly one-fifth of the prison’s population, according to a presentation at APHA 2026. 

During the Monday session titled “No Time to Wait: A Case for Releasing Elders from California’s Women’s Prisons,” advocates examined the health and financial costs of incarcerating older women.

Incarcerating an older woman in a California state prison costs more than $380,000 annually, according to the report presented by Pam Fadem, a coordinating committee member of the California Coalition for Women Prisoners. That is two to three times the cost of incarcerating a younger person, largely because of increased healthcare needs.

“We think this is beyond belief and a waste of taxpayer money — but mostly, it is a waste of human life and dignity,” Fadem said.

Researchers have linked each year spent in prison to a two-year reduction in life expectancy. For Chyrl Lamar, medical care during her incarceration has had lasting consequences. After being repeatedly shuffled between doctors, she lacked consistent care from a provider familiar with her heart condition, resulting in inadequate treatment, she said on Monday. 

Lamar’s experience reflects a broader problem: 88% of older women incarcerated in California report experiencing medical abuse or neglect, according to the report.

“This isn’t simply a medical issue,” Lamar said. “It’s about being heard; it’s about human dignity and having confidence that someone inside will listen and pay attention to what’s happening to me.”

Now out of prison, Lamar takes heart medication that she will need for the rest of her life.

The challenges facing older women in prison reflect a broader national trend: The U.S. prison population is aging. In 1991, people ages 50 and older accounted for just 3% of the incarcerated population. By 2021, that share had grown to 15%. If current trends continue, one in three people incarcerated in the U.S. could be ages 50 and older by 2030.

The fast-aging population is the result of decades of “tough-on-crime” policies that have had a disproportionate impact on low-income people and people of color. In California, a quarter of incarcerated women are Black, despite representing just 6% of the state’s overall population, found a 2023 report presented by Renae Badruzzaman, senior project manager of Health Instead of Punishment at Health in Partnership. 

Structural oppression underlies the background for most women in prison, her report found. Up to 90% of people incarcerated in women’s prisons report having experienced prior emotional, physical or sexual abuse. These factors raise the risk of incarceration, largely due to a lack of resources for mental health support services and non-carceral violence intervention.

California is preparing for its aging prison population with plans to invest $73 billion over the next 20 years in carceral infrastructure, including facilities for hospice care, dementia care and assisted living.

Despite the substantial resources required to incarcerate older adults, they pose relatively little risk to public safety. Fewer than 8% of people ages 50 to 59 return to prison within three years of release. Among those ages 60 and older, that figure drops to less than 5%.

“Releasing 740 elders from the women’s prisons will help to address the advancing crisis of a rapidly aging prison population,” Fadem said.

Story from AHPA can be found here. 

 

‘Put them down with gas’: Abuse and retaliation inside a California women’s prison

Cal Matters 

October 19, 2026

Madi Bolaños and Sukey Lewis of KQED

Hear more of the story on the podcast We Are Jane Doe, from KQED’s Snap Studios.

Aliksandria Prout was at home the evening of Aug. 2, 2024, when her phone rang. It was her former cellmate at the Central California Women’s Facility. Catrina Cameron was nearly incoherent over the prison phone line. 

“She told me she couldn’t see outta one eye,” Prout recalled. Cameron told Prout that correctional officers had sprayed her and dozens of other women with tear gas and pepper spray. “Our other cellmate had gotten beat up by correctional staff.”

Prout could barely grasp the enormity of the incident. As the public would later learn, correctional officers had removed 159 women from a prison housing unit, confined them for more than four hours in a dining hall without food, water or medication, and then unleashed streams of pepper spray and chemical blast grenades on them when tensions escalated. 

Later, as the prisoners sat outside on the hot, dusty yard with their hands zip-tied behind their backs, officers again used tear gas and pepper grenades on them.

Read the full Story from Cal Matters here. 

Advocates urge governor to commute all life sentences

L.A. Wave Newspaper

October 13, 2026

Wave Staff

By Antonio‌ ‌Ray‌ ‌Harvey‌ Contributing Writer

SACRAMENTO — The members of the Drop Life Without Parole, a grassroots coalition and sentencing reform group, along with other advocacy organizations, are asking Gov. Gavin Newsom to commute the sentences of more than 5,000 individuals serving life sentences in California before he leaves office.

Drop Life Without Parole, along with the California Coalition for Women Prisoners, the Anti-Violence, Safety and Accountability Project, human rights advocates and family members of incarcerated people, called for the release of California prisoners serving life without parole during a Sept. 29 news conference and rally on the west steps of the State Capitol.

Amber Rose Howard, the executive director of Californians United for a Responsible Budget, said those serving life without parole already play a vital role in the broader push for commutations.

“We are here today because we care so much about ending life without parole sentencing,” Howard said. “So many people serving life without parole are the reason why that’s been able to happen. The programs, services, and all of the things that happen inside (of prisons) that rehabilitate (the incarcerated) started many years ago by folks with life without parole. They have proven that we can change ourselves. They paved the way to get ourselves free.”

Californians United for a Responsible Budget is a Black-led statewide coalition of more than 100 grassroots organizations dedicated to shrinking the state’s prison system and redirecting public spending from corrections to community care.

Among advocates and incarcerated people, life without parole is often described as “death by incarceration” or the “other death penalty.”

The calls for commutations come as Newsom is reportedly holding discussions with key advisers about sparing the lives of all 563 prisoners on California’s death row before leaving office in January. According to a number of Capitol insiders and California Black Media sources close to the governor’s office, Newsom has been considering commuting their death sentences to life imprisonment without parole, a move that would represent the largest mass death row commutation in modern U.S. history. 

Newsom, who imposed a moratorium on executions in 2019, has not made a final decision. The reported discussions are separate from advocates’ demands for clemency for more than 5,000 prisoners already serving life without parole.

California ranks third in the United States for the total number of people serving life without parole sentences, according to a 2021 report by UC Irvine’s Department of Criminology, Law and Society. The state currently has 5,134 people serving life without the possibility of parole sentences.

Roughly 68% of those serving life without parole in the state are Black or Latino, 62% were 25 or younger at the time of their offense, and 71% were first-time convicted, according to data cited by the Drop Life Without Parole Coalition.

According to Newsom’s office, he has granted 276 pardons, 169 commutations and 43 reprieves during his time in office as of April of this year. The grantees were recommended for clemency by elected officials, correctional staff, including a former prison warden, medical professionals, teachers, and community and faith leaders.

Newsom leaves office in January when his second term ends.

“The governor weighs numerous factors in clemency cases, including an applicant’s self-development since the offense, if the grant is consistent with public safety, and the impact of a grant on the community, including crime victims and survivors,” Newsom’s office said in a statement last April.

Criminal justice experts claim that hope is the most vital protective factor against despair and suicide for individuals who carry the sentence. From the perspective of former prisoners, they argue, restoring or sustaining a sense of hope, is a mechanism that allows them to prove to themselves and society that they are not defined solely by their worst mistake.

Opposition to commuting life-without-parole sentences in California has come from victims’ rights groups, law enforcement organizations and some victims’ families. The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, Crime Victims United and the Peace Officers Research Association of California have argued that expanding opportunities for commutation or resentencing undermines the finality of sentences and promises made to victims’ families.

The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and its allies have also challenged new California Board of Parole hearing regulations that provide a process for recommending resentencing or commutation for some incarcerated people, including those serving life without parole sentences.

“Understand what is at stake for those who were promised that life without the possibility of parole meant exactly that,” the Crime Victims United said in a statement opposing California state policies on commutation.

Barbara Chavez, an Outside Policy Fellow for the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, champions criminal justice reform and campaigns to end life without parole sentences.

Opposition to commuting life-without-parole sentences in California has come from victims’ rights groups, law enforcement organizations and some victims’ families. The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, Crime Victims United and the Peace Officers Research Association of California have argued that expanding opportunities for commutation or resentencing undermines the finality of sentences and promises made to victims’ families.

The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and its allies have also challenged new California Board of Parole hearing regulations that provide a process for recommending resentencing or commutation for some incarcerated people, including those serving life without parole sentences.

“Understand what is at stake for those who were promised that life without the possibility of parole meant exactly that,” the Crime Victims United said in a statement opposing California state policies on commutation.

Barbara Chavez, an Outside Policy Fellow for the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, champions criminal justice reform and campaigns to end life without parole sentences.

“No Time to Wait”: The Unseen Costs of Aging in California’s Women’s Prisons

Roughly 30% of California’s prison population is past age 50– and that number is increasing every year.

It costs 2-3x more to incarcerate an elderly person compared to the general population. That is an annual cost of $255,000–$383,00 per elderly person.

What are the unseen costs of aging in prison?

Thank you:

UC Berkeley Law Policy Clinic

California Coalition for Women Prisoners

Uncommon Law

Featuring:

  • Jane Dorotik
  • Colby Lenz
  • Mychal Macias
  • Devan Shea
  • Maiya Zwerling
  • Caroline McGinnis
  • LaVelma Byrd
  • Rosemary Dyer

Video / Interview / Edit Chisato Hughes

Produced by UC Sentencing Project

Music Blue Dot Sessions

Warden at Central California Women’s Prison Ousted Amid Sexual Abuse Scandal

 
 

Anissa De La Cruz is no longer warden of the Central California Women’s Facility as of Tuesday. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation says she will become a correctional administrator at nearby Valley State Prison next month.

The move comes one month after the U.S. Department of Justice found a “unbroken pattern” of sexual assault and retaliation at the facility. The Justice Department began investigating the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla and the California Institution for Women in Chino nearly two years ago after hundreds of incarcerated women filed legal claims alleging sexual exploitation by staff and an officer was arrested for sexually abusing at least 22 women.

Elizabeth Nomura is a formerly incarcerated advocate with the California Coalition for Women Prisoners. She says the issue of sexual assault in prisons is bigger than one person.

Read the full story from KQED here.